In the residency, the student takes a position in an organization involved
in public health or the health care system, broadly defined. The student
gains general managerial experience within the organization and, in cooperation
with the preceptor at the residency site, identifies a specific project
to research. The research, besides its direct benefit to the organization,
must demonstrate an ability to apply theory to practice. The student writes
up this research in a Residency Report that is formally presented to the
School of Public Health.
Course and Work Requirements
MHA students take HSPM 797, Management Residency, for 6 hours. MPH students
take HSPM 798, Public Health Residency, for 6 hours. Students may take
additional residency hours, with Department permission.
MHA students taking all six hours for HSPM 797 in one Fall or Spring
semester spend 32 hours/week (4 days) in the facility or agency. MPH students
taking all six hours of HSPM 798 in one Fall or Spring semester spend a
minimum of 20 hours a week in the facility or agency. Students taking their
residency hours during the Summer should expect to devote full-time to
their residency. Students employed full-time generally find it feasible
to do the residency half-time over two semesters.
Please note that a Graduate Assistantship contract can cover no more than 20 hours per week.
What Makes a Good Residency
The residency requires students to apply and test the theories, skills
and knowledge acquired in the academic setting. Practical application of
skills and knowledge is an essential part of professional degree programs,
offering learning opportunities not available in classrooms. The residency
is a planned and supervised learning experience gained through first-hand
observations and operational responsibilities in a health services organization.
In addition to gaining some breadth of experience within the host organization,
students identify and work toward the solution of a specific management
problem or policy issue.
The best residency prepares students for employment or advancement in
health services policy or management. Good residencies have these characteristics:
Students are challenged to define and/or clarify a management or policy
problem in a real world setting and explore appropriate solutions.
Students develop administrative skills and improve self-confidence by participating
in management and assisting in multiple projects as assigned.
Preceptors, the on-site supervisors of the residencies, provide students
guidance by serving as mentors and by assessing progress and offering professional
insight at frequent intervals.
Host institutions benefit from relevant and realistic residency efforts.
Faculty gain assurance of student mastery of theory, management and organizational
interpersonal skills.
Faculty Advisor
To supervise the residency, the student has an advisor and a preceptor.
The residency advisor may be any faculty member of the Department of Health
Services Policy and Management. Advisors not holding ful-time appointments in the Department
must be approved by the Chair.
The Faculty Advisor's responsibilities include:
helping students clarify and understand the objectives of the residency;
helping the student to develop particular learning goals for the residency;
recommending texts, readings, and other resources as appropriate to the
setting and the problem under study;
helping the student locate a residency site and a preceptor;
approving the project(s) to be undertaken in the residency;
maintaining regular contact with the student during the residency;
working with preceptors to ensure an effective experience;
evaluating the student's paper and oral presentation to develop an overall
evaluation of the residency.
Preceptor
The Preceptor is the person at the residency site who supervises the residency.
The preceptor's responsibilities include:
understanding the residency requirements and the ability to meet them;
identifying a suitable project, including initial identification of a specific
management problem area or policy issue;
planning an overall orientation to the site making the student feel welcome;
discussing and involving the student in meetings with governance and management
at all levels of the organization;
having weekly meetings with the student during the residency. These meetings
should allow for discussion of management responsibilities and current
and ongoing assignment and issues at the site;
working with the faculty advisor to design or adjust the experience as
needed;
evaluating the student, reviewing the evaluation with the student, and
sending a copy of the evaluation to the faculty advisor at the completion
of the residency.
Approvals
Both the Faculty Advisor and the Preceptor must approve the scope and content
of the residency project. Both must sign the Residency Proposal and Approval
Form no later than two weeks after starting the residency. The Residency
Proposal and Approval Form is used as the first page for both the proposal
and the final report. Blank Residency Proposal and Approval Forms are available
at the Department Office. You can also get a form by printing page 46 of our on-line
handbook.
Copies of the final approved residency report will be given to the faculty
advisor, the faculty second reader, and the preceptor. Also, two
copies must be given to the Graduate Director for the Department’s archives.
The archive copies must be delivered before the candidate can be cleared
for graduation. This makes six copies total, assuming that the student
wants one for himself or herself.
The residency for those in the Gerontology Certificate must focus on
the elderly or aging process. It must be approved by the Gerontology Certificate
Director.
It is the responsibility of the student to obtain faculty and preceptor
signatures on both the proposal and the final report. It is also the student's
responsibility to assure that a copy of both the preceptor's student evaluation
and the student's evaluation are submitted to the faculty advisor. A grade
will not be assigned for the residency AND THE STUDENT CANNOT GRADUATE
until the final report and residency evaluation forms have been turned
in.
Special Residency Requirements for MHA Candidates
Halfway through the residency, the MHA student must meet with the faculty
advisor, or submit a written mid-term report, to discuss the extent of
progress.
MHA students are required to attend a series of four management seminars
during the semester of their residencies. The purpose of these one hour
seminars is to allow for discussion of the residency experience with other
residency students, present their project proposal, present a summary of
the final report and evaluate the residency experience.
At the completion of the residency, the student will submit a residency
evaluation form which includes a description of the experience gained,
the administrative skills developed, appraisal of the applicability of
classroom learning to practice, and the strengths and weaknesses of the
residency. The Final Report should emphasize the management problem on
which the student worked.
Also at the conclusion of the residency, the preceptor will complete
a written evaluation of the student's performance during the time of the
residency, emphasizing student progress in dealing with the specific management
problem(s) undertaken.
Students are assigned a grade of satisfactory (s) or unsatisfactory
(u).
Finding a Location
The residency is the culminating experience for students in health services policy
and management.
Planning for it should begin as early as possible for the MPH students
and at the beginning of the second year for the MHA student. To begin with,
entering students have a general idea of why they are interested in becoming
a health administrator. As students matriculate, ideas become refined or
change due to increased understanding of what the management of health
services organizations is all about. The first step in planning the residency
is to explore all possible options. Faculty advisors can often help with
this. This should begin and proceed as early as possible. As soon as students
become aware of the career entry or progression opportunities, they should
begin to seek out possible residency sites. Students should explore a range
of options, visit sites, talk with graduates and managers in health systems
organizations to identify where they would like to work. Again, faculty
advisors can frequently assist students, though student initiative is essential
here as it is throughout the residency experience.
Numerous state and federal departments and agencies, as well as hospitals
and a range of health care organizations, have provided excellent residency
locations. Examples include:
Adolescent Clinic, Medical College, Augusta, GA
Aiken Regional Medical Center, Aiken, SC
Army Aeromedical Center, Ft. Rucker, AL
Brian Center Nursing Care, Columbia, SC
Calhoun Convalescent Center, St. Matthews, SC
Companion Technologies, Columbia, SC
Conway Hospital, Conway, SC
Coastal Orthopedics, Conway, SC
Family Health Centers, Inc., Orangeburg, SC
Georgetown Memorial Hospital, Georgetown, SC
Hall Institute [SC Dept. of Mental Health]
Harris-Methodist Medical Center, Ft. Worth, TX
HealthSouth Rehabilitation Center, Columbia, SC
HealthSouth Rehabilitation Center, Charleston, SC
Humana Specialty Hospital - Charlotte, NC
John Martin Primary Care Center, Winnsboro, SC
Kershaw County Memorial Hospital, Kershaw, SC
Lexington Family Practice, Lexington, SC
Lexington Extended Care, Lexington, SC
Lexington Medical Center, West Columbia, SC
Manor Care Center, West Columbia, SC
Manor Care of Potomac, MD
MedCorp Health Systems, Columbia, SC
Palmetto Baptist Medical Center, Columbia, SC
Palmetto Baptist Medical Center, Easley, SC
Palmetto Health Alliance
Palmetto Richland Memorial Hospital, Columbia, SC
Palmetto Senior Care, Columbia, SC
Premier Health Services, Columbia, SC
Presbyterian Retirement Community, Winter Park, FL
Primary Care Association of South Carolina
Providence Hospital, Columbia, SC
Rhode Island State Health Dept. WIC Program, Providence, RI
Self Memorial Hospital, Greenwood, SC
St. Andrews Day Hospital, Irmo, SC
St. Xavier Hospital, Charleston, SC
Shands Hospital, Univ. Florida, Gainesville, FL
S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC)
S.C. General Assembly
S.C. Department of Health and Human Services
S.C. Hospital Association, West Columbia, SC
S.C. State Budget and Control Board
Spartanburg Regional Medical Center, Spartanburg, SC
Tuomey Hospital, Sumter, SC
United Way of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
University of Alabama Hospital, Birmingham, AL
William Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Hospital, Columbia, SC
Williamsburg Landing [Virginia] Home Health Agency, VA
Proposal
The best interests of a student are served when a Residency helps to prepare
that student for post-graduate employment. In particular, the student should
gain the ability to participate effectively and to solve management problems
in health care organizations. The problem selected for extensive study
and research should be identified in collaboration with the preceptor PRIOR
TO STARTING THE RESIDENCY.
The written proposal should be submitted to the preceptor and faculty
advisor for review and approval two weeks after starting the residency.
For many students, the proposal becomes the first part of the final report.
The more work is done early on the proposal, the less has to be done later
on the report.
The residency proposal should consist of:
Problem Statement: The proposal should start with a description of the
setting of the residency. Then should come a clear statement of the problem
to be addressed and a brief rationale for the study. The problem statement
and rationale should be followed by a clear description of what learning
objectives (student-oriented) and performance objectives (host institution-oriented)
are to be achieved, and a specification of desired outcomes. An example
might be: "This project will result in recommendations for the number of
additional work stations/OR suites/additional personnel needed, based on
all clinical and fiscal data, together with explicit professional judgments
and preferences of key providers and management."
Initial Literature Review: The purpose of a review of relevant literature
is to take advantage of relevant data or other sources of information whether
through case studies, the practical implications of empirical research,
and/or experts in the field. A good review will improve the quality of
the problem statement, the execution and results of the project, and often
save time. The review should consist of no less than 10 pages with a minimum
of 15 references.
Methods: The methodology section of the proposal should outline what approach
will be taken to achieve the results desired. This may include data gathering
(primary or secondary data), interviews, case study development and/or
other appropriate means.
When the proposal is acceptable to the preceptor and the faculty advisor,
they sign the top portion of the Residency Proposal and Approval Form.
(As mentioned, this form is available from our Department Office, or by printing
page 46 of our on-line handbook.
Final Report
A residency culminates in a typewritten report that follows the format
specified below. The residency also requires an oral presentation to faculty,
students and others interested in the topic.
As the time for the final reports approaches, students should ask a
faculty member, other than the advisor, to be the second reader. The second
reader will read the final written report and attend the oral presentation.
Final approval of the written and oral reports requires the approval of
the faculty advisor, the second Departmental reader, and the preceptor.
Preceptors are strongly encouraged to attend the oral presentation.
Oral presentations will not scheduled without signature of the faculty
advisor on the Final Approval of Written Report. One week prior to the
oral presentation, the student should post announcements of the presentation
in the Department and School. The announcement should state the student's
name, degree candidacy, title of presentation, date, time, and location.
The report should have a plastic or heavy paper cover and be bound at
the left edge. The cover should have the following information centered
on the front:
- Title of Project
- Residency Site
- Date
- Student's Name
- Degree for which the student is a candidate
- Preceptor
- Faculty advisor
- Faculty Second Reader
Because both the faculty advisor and the second faculty reader must approve
the written report before the oral portion of this requirement, it is strongly
recommended that students submit their final report for review two weeks
prior to the oral presentation.
As mentioned, candidates must submit five bound copies of the final,
accepted, written report. Two copies are for the Department, and one copy
each are for the faculty advisor, the second reader, and the preceptor.
Report Format
Notes, citations, and bibliography must be prepared in a standard style,
such as PMLA, APA, Turabian, or the Chicago Style Manual. The Final
Report must meet style and format standards acceptable to the faculty advisor
and preceptor. The paper must be double spaced with one (1) inch margins
on all 4 sides. Text should be full-justified. The main text
font should be 12-point, with 10-point font for quotations or references
that are inset.
The Residency Proposal and Approval Form, signed
by the preceptor, the faculty advisor, and the second reader, should be
the first page in the report. The Executive Summary should be the second
page. It should be a one page single spaced summary of the problem, methods,
results, and recommendations.
The final report must follow this outline:
Residency Proposal and Approval Form
Executive Summary
Title page of Report
Table of Contents
List of Illustrations or Figures (if there are illustrations or figures)
List of Tables (if there are tables)
I. Introduction
A. Statement of the Problem
B. Major Objectives
C. Review of the Literature
II. Methods
III. Results
IV. Discussion
A. Summary
B. Conclusions
C. Recommendations
V. A Brief Review of the Residency
A. Strengths
B. Weaknesses
C. Recommendations regarding the residency
Appendices
Bibliography
The oral report follows the same outline (items I through V) as the written
report, except that the Review of the Literature is very brief.
Exemption from the Residency
An exemption from the MHA residency may be allowed for the very experienced
health care manager who is currently employed in a health services organization.
The experienced health care manager may take 6 hours of prescribed doctoral
course work in either a research or policy track. The student must obtain
approval of exempting the residency from the faculty advisor and the Director
of the program. At the completion of the course work, the student is required
to complete and conduct a Final Report. A grade will be assigned by the
course instructor.
On exceptional occasions, an exemption from the residency requirement
may be permitted for MPH candidates. These are made on a case-by-case basis,
depending on career goals and needed course work. Students wishing exemption
should prepare a letter addressed to the chairman of the department specifying
the reasons for the request of exemption. The chair will bring the student's
request to a meeting of the department faculty, who make a recommendation
to the Dean. The Dean of the School of Public Health has final authority
regarding MPH residency exemptions.
The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly
those of the page author. The contents of this page have not been reviewed or
approved by the University of South Carolina.
http://hspm.sph.sc.edu/Programs/Residency.html